WikiLeaks, Israel, and the 9/11 Crime Gang
Updated – December 27, 2010
Forthcoming WikiLeaks cables on Israel may expose some of the crimes of the Israeli mega-terrorist Ehud Barak.
TRUTH WILL OUT – A protester in London shows her support for imprisoned Julian Assange using Shakespeare’s line from The Merchant of Venice – “truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man’s son may, but at the length truth will out.”
“The Guardian, El Pais and Le Monde have published only two percent of the files related to Israel due to the sensitive relations between Germany, France and Israel. Even the New York Times could not publish more due to the sensitivities related to the Jewish community in the US.”
– Julian Assange to Al Jazeera, December 22, 2010
Source: ‘Cables to be released on Israel, Lebanon, Mabhouh’, Jerusalem Post
WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed. But the U.S., with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone.
– “Don’t shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths” by Julian Assange, The Australian, December 8, 2010
In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.
– U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on U.S. 713 New York Times Co. v. United States
Sweden is in the middle of the storm swirling around Julian Assange.
There seems to be an effort underway on the Internet to discredit Julian Assange and WikiLeaks as some sort of Israeli intelligence plot. The basis of this illogical effort seems to be based on the fact that the newspapers that received the WikiLeaks material have not published cables critical of Israel. Recently, Assange told Al Jazeera that WikiLeaks cables on Israel will be released in the coming months. He explained that the newspapers chose not to publish cables concerning Israel. Assange reportedly claims to have about 3,700 files related to Israel, most from the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv. Assange said that WikiLeaks plans to release “top secret” cables regarding Israel’s war with Hezbollah militants in Lebanon in the summer of 2006.
“WikiLeaks will release cables concerning Israel, the Second Lebanon War and the Mabhouh assassination in the next six months,” the Jerusalem Post reported on December 23, quoting the Al Jazeera interview with Assange. Only a small number of documents related to Israel have been published so far because newspapers in the West that had exclusive rights to publish the material were hesitant to publish sensitive information about Israel, the Qatari newspaper the Peninsula reported, citing the interview.
Assange has also reportedly made comments that indicate that he is not very well versed or keen on the 9/11 terrorism conspiracy. It would be wonderful if Assange were an engaged 9/11 skeptic and we could access the secret cables of the people involved in the false-flag terror atrocity that changed the world, but such plans are very seldom written down or exchanged on the Internet.
As an American journalist who was brutally attacked at my home by undercover police and maliciously prosecuted for my research and writing about 9/11, I tried unsuccessfully to contact Julian Assange when he began having legal problems in Sweden last summer. Had I gotten through to Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, I would have strongly advised him not to trust the legal system or to turn himself in to the authorities in Britain, as he did earlier this week. The reason, I would explain, is that one should never negotiate with terrorists and criminals. Julian now finds himself in the belly of the beast, and the beast is a real terrorist. Extricating himself from the grasp of British and U.S. intelligence services will be difficult and he is at their mercy so long as he is in their custody. As we know, these people do not have any mercy for people like Assange.
One needs to keep a few key facts in mind concerning the material released by WikiLeaks:
1. The material was leaked to the press by U.S. citizens within the military or government;
2. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are illegal wars of aggression;
3. Iran has the legal right to develop its nuclear program.
The illegality of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is a subject that is seldom discussed in the U.S. media. As the victor of the genocidal war against Germany, the United States wrote the Nuremberg Charter with the intention of using it against the vanquished Nazis. The idea that the United States would be involved in a criminal war of aggression is beyond the pale for most Americans who consume mind-numbing war propaganda along with their breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Most Americans don’t know, for example, that the U.S. and Britain targeted the civilian population of Germany and that nearly every German city was completely incinerated in 1945 and millions of German civilians killed after the war by intentional starvation in hundreds of concentration camps. Most Americans would be shocked to know that the camps run by General Eisenhower and the U.S. Army were the real “death camps” in which hundreds of thousands of innocent Germans were literally starved to death. These egregious war crimes against the German people define genocide and holocaust.*
Millions of innocent Germans were held in General Eisenhower’s death camps after the war…
in which nothing, not even water, was provided for the prisoners and where more than one million died from starvation. German prison camps, like Buchenwald, were much better equipped and organized than the U.S. camps, in which death was all that awaited the prisoners.
The war in Afghanistan, however, can legally be described as a “war of aggression.” The invasion and occupation was planned in advance of 9/11, which was actually a false-flag terror attack designed to sway public opinion to support the military conquest of the poor, but strategically located and mineral-rich Central Asian nation. The fact that President Barack Obama adopted the illegal war policy in Afghanistan makes him just as culpable as George W. Bush and the people who conspired and began the criminal war in 2001.
The latest release of secret U.S. embassy cables by WikiLeaks shows how the State Department uses its influence to get other nations to support the criminal Zionist war policy in the Middle East. This policy means corrupting European nations to get them to actively support the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while coming down hard on Iran for developing its nuclear program, which it is legally entitled to. Because the war in Afghanistan is a criminal war, the State Department efforts corrupt other states by making them party to a war crime.
Looking through the WikiLeaks cables released on December 8, I found an interesting cable from Alan D. Solomont, U.S. Ambassador to Spain. The name jumped out at me because the Solomont family of Boston is closely connected to the destruction of steel from the World Trade Center, my current subject of research. The Solomont cables indicate that the ambassador was pushing Spain to send more troops to Afghanistan although Spanish public opinion has always been strongly opposed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Spain is also being pressed to take a tough line against Iran for its nuclear program, which it is legally entitled to.
Alan Solomont was a crucial fundraiser and donor for Barack Obama, and was given the position as U.S. Ambassador in return for the millions of dollars he raised. The Solomont family is well-known for its financial crimes. One of Alan’s brothers, Jay, served time in an Israeli prison for misappropriation of funds, while his other brother, David, was accused of embezzling $1 million from a start-up firm (settled out of court).
Ambassador Solomont was a crucial supporter of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and is a close friend of Senator John Kerry, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
While Ambassador Solomont’s family connections to Israeli criminals may seem de rigueur among members of the Zionist crimocracy running the Obama White House, the Solomont family relationship with one of the key players in the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center is quite telling and deserves to be noted.
Jay Solomont, the ambassador’s brother who served time in an Israeli prison for financial crimes, is married to Debra Weiner. Debra’s sister, Beth Weiner, is married to Jehuda Saar, one of the two Israelis who organized the network to dispose of the steel from the destroyed World Trade Center.
Jehuda Saar, one of the Israelis who worked for Marc Rich, arranged for the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center in Asian smelters.
Jehuda Saar and Nathan K. Fruchter are two orthodox Jews (with family connections to the Jewish diamond dealers of Antwerpen) who worked with the Israeli Mossadnik Marc Rich (Glencore AG) in the 1990s in the United States and Europe. In January 1999, the Mossad sent them to Hugo Neu, the scrap metal trader of New York and New Jersey to create an “international trading division”.
This “international trading division” of Hugo Neu was used to dispose of many tons of the critical steel evidence from the World Trade Center, before it could be examined by engineers. This is part of the 9/11 crime for which we can clearly identify the culprits. This will be dealt with in greater detail in the final chapter of my book about 9/11, which I hope to have ready soon.
Jehuda Saar, the garbage man, was part of Mossad’s 9/11 clean-up crew, sending the steel evidence from the World Trade Center to steel mills in Asia - where it was destroyed far from the prying eyes of U.S. investigators and engineers.
Knowing that he was part of a massive crime against the people of the United States, Saar moved to Israel with his family.
In Israel, Saar supports Benjamin Netanyahu, who is part of the 9/11 criminal network…
and enjoys life with his share of the ill-gotten $36 million made from selling some 300,000 tons of steel from the destroyed World Trade Center.
Nathan K. Fruchter of Lawrence (Long Island), New York, and Israel, was Saar’s partner at Hugo Neu. Both Saar and Fruchter are still listed as doing business in the United States as Idoru Trading LLC at 505 Jorgen Street in Lawrence, New York. I called Idoru to see what information I could get out of the people who arranged the sale of the steel to China. An Israeli man answered the phone. I asked for Nathan Fruchter and after a few seconds was speaking with him.
Nathan Fruchter was a passenger on the first flight from China on the A380.
Fruchter is an orthodox Jew, like nearly every one of the 9/11 culprits. For the orthodox nationalist Jews, serving the state of Israel is a religious obligation. For this reason they make perfect agents for the Mossad.
Danny Fruchter, an Israeli Mossadnik diamond dealer who had offices in Antwerpen, Belgium, is probably an uncle to Nathan.
Fruchter came to the phone. I introduced myself as a journalist writing about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. I asked Fruchter about the role he and Jehuda Saar played in the recycling of the steel. He said “cut the crap” and hung up the phone.
I called right back and Fruchter answered the phone. I said that my phone had apparently dropped the connection. Although he was unwilling to discuss the recycling of the steel, he
told me that Sims had taken over Hugo Neu, which is not quite true.
When I pressed him on the steel from the World Trade Center, Fruchter said he had been fired from Hugo Neu on January 30, 2000, which is certainly not true. The International Herald Tribune did a story about Fruchter in November 2000 in which he is described as being “vice president of the international trading division of Hugo Neu Corporation in Manhattan.”
Why would Fruchter lie about when he worked at Hugo Neu, who “recycled” much of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center?
I called Hugo Neu to ask when Fruchter left the company and what his role had been in the recycling of the steel. I was able to ask two questions:
What role did the international trading division headed by Nathan Fruchter and Jehuda Saar play in the recycling of the steel from the WTC?
How long did Nathan Fruchter and Jehuda Saar head your international trading division?
I left my email address and am still awaiting a response from Hugo Neu. Given the reluctance of the people involved in the destruction of the steel World Trade Center to speak, I am not holding my breath. There is much more to this story about Hugo Neu and its connections to the Mossad and Israeli military intelligence services, which will be detailed in my forthcoming chapter.
Hugo Neu is named after its founder, the current owner’s father. Hugo Neu worked with Walter Rothschild and Meno Lippauer, German Jews who came to the United States in the early 20th Century. What is very interesting is that Hugo Neu is an investor in an Israeli/Mossad venture capital fund called the AquaAgroFund.
One of the managing partners of the AquaAgroFund is Nir Belzer, who is also the co-founder of the Millenium Material Technologies Funds (MMT). The MMT is a fund that is run by three Israeli men and specializes in energetic nano-coatings and thin films.
See MMT portfolio here http://www.mmtfund.com/portfolio.html
Belzer’s information is here: http://www.aquagrofund.com/Team.aspx#Nir
Belzer co-founded the MMT fund with Oren Gafri, who runs a company called Cima NanoTech, which specializes in production of super-thin energetic coatings, exactly like the coating of nano-thermite that was used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9/11. Like most Mossad technology companies, Cima NanoTech is really based in Israel:
Cima NanoTech is based in the US, with its R&D center in Caesarea, Israel, and a commercial manufacturing facility in Hiroshima, Japan. Additional laboratory facilities in Korea, Japan, and the US support the work of the Israel lab and enable close, local partnerships with electronics manufacturers to meet their specific needs.
Gafri has a background in nano-coatings and R&D with the Israeli military and its Nuclear Research Center in the Negev:
Oren Gafri is one of the founders of the Millennium Materials Funds.
Mr. Gafri is the Chairman of the Israeli Material & Processes Society (IMPS), Technion, and the chairman of the Israeli Welding Institute (IWI) Ltd. Mr. Gafri was previously CEO of Pulsar Welding Ltd. (in respect of which he was elected by the Tel Aviv University to be Entrepreneur of the Year 1998), a portfolio company of MMT I (1996-2001), and General Manager of Chemitas Ltd. (1989-1995), the largest manufacturer and supplier of specialty chemicals in Israel (a partnership of Metallgesellscaft/ Chemetall, and Tambour Paints).
During the years 1979 to 1989 Mr. Gafri served as an executive of the Israeli Aircraft Industries Ltd (IAI), Bedek Division, as the Manager of Materials and Process, in charge of the Chemical, Metallurgical, Composite and Non Destructive Testing (NDT) facilities, Labs and R&D.
Mr. Gafri received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. studies in Materials & Process Engineering at Ben-Gurion University (with a specialization in thin films and plasma coating) and completed a Business Administration for Engineers program at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem with the IAI and the School for Business Administration, and other training courses at the Nuclear Research Center – Negev (Israel), IAI, Leybold Heraeus (USA), Parker & Amchem/Henkel (USA), Metallgesellschaft/ Chemetall (Germany) and Atotech (Germany and the U.K.).
The final chapter of Solving 9/11 will examine this material and more in greater detail. It will be sent to those who donate to Bollyn.com and will be published in early 2011.
Sources and Recommended Reading and Viewing:
Julian Assange interview with David Frost, December 22, 2010
WikiLeaks homepage is at http://22.214.171.124/
WikiLeaks U.S. Embassy Cables are at http://126.96.36.199/cablegate.html
‘Cables to be released on Israel, Lebanon, Mabhouh’, Jerusalem Post, December 23, 2010
‘WikiLeaks to publish Israel cables on Second Lebanon War, Dubai assassination’, Haaretz, December 23, 2010
“WikiLeaks to release more Israel cables”, JTA, December 23, 2010
Alan D. Solomont Biography, Ambassador Spain and Andorra, U.S. Department of State
“Brotherly trouble”, by Steve Bailey, Boston Globe, March 24, 2004
“Frequent Travelers Pick the Best and the Worst Airports : The Good, the Bad and the Ugly“, by Mary A. Kelly, International Herald Tribune, November 17, 2000
Solomont family donates millions to political candidates, OpenSecrets.org
“US embassy cables: US embassy in Madrid asks Spain to find creative solutions to Nazi looted art problem”, Guardian, December 8, 2010
* The Allied war crimes and genocide against the German people are well documented in the following recommended books and articles:
BrandstÃ¤tten by JÃ¶rg Friedrich is an excellent book on the Allied bombardment of German cities in 1945.
“Eisenhower’s Death Camps – The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two” by James Bacque, September 1989
BrandstÃ¤tten: Der Anblick des Bombenkriegs, by JÃ¶rg Friedrich, PropylÃ¤en, MÃ¼nchen 2003
Martha Heinrich Acht Dresden 1944/45, by Mattheas Neutzner, Verlag der Kunst Dresden 1998
Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East, by Alfred M. de Zayas, Picton Press, Rockport, Maine 1998
Other Losses: The Shocking Truth Behind the Mass Deaths of Disarmed German Soldiers and Civilians Under General Eisenhower’s Command, by James Bacque, Prisma Publishing, 1991 (First published by Stoddart Publishing Co. Ltd., Canada 1989)
Note: Due to the transfer of information from the original website to this updated format, some article post dates may differ from the date they were originally published. However, most articles contain the actual publish date at the top of the article.